Part 4 – Legislated Assimilation – Development of the Indian Act (1820-1927)
What harm did the British do to the Indian economy?
British economic exploitation, the decay of indigenous industries, the failure of modern industries to replace them, high taxation, the drain of wealth to Britain and a backward agrarian structure leading to the stagnation of agriculture and the exploitation of the poor peasants by the zamindars, landlords, princes, …
How did the British harm the Indians?
They legally and socially discriminated against Indians and people of mixed race, who were also shunned by Indian people. They forced Indian farmers into a global market and mandated the growth of commercial crops, which left them open to the ups and downs of supply and demand.
What was one positive thing the British did for the Indian economy?
Improvement of government in the native states. Security of life and property. Services of educated administrators, who have achieved these results. Materially: Loans for railways and irrigation. Development of a few valuable products, such as indigo, tea, coffee, silk, etc.
What good did British do to India?
So let’s take a look at 7 Good Things The British Did For India And Indians!
- English language. The reason they taught English to the Indians was to have an ease of administration. …
- Indian Railways. …
- Army. …
- Vaccination. …
- Social reforms. …
- India census. …
- Surveying India.
What were the positive and negative effects of British rule of Indians?
What were the positives and negative effects of British rule on Indians? Positive: Improved transport, Farming methods, order justice, and education. Negative: Exploitation, destruction of local industry, deforestation, and famine.
What were the positive and negative effects of British imperialism in India?
India was better off than Pakistan. … Negatives: Indian villages were not self-sufficient, They did not have control of their government or their economy, Not Indian owned industries. Positives: Railroad systems were built, India was modernized, less conflicts between local leaders.
Was British colonialism good or bad for India?
But many historians generally consider the British presence in India, while at times horrifically violent, to be one of the most benevolent and productive in colonial history. …
What was one negative consequence of the British Raj’s rule in India?
What was one negative consequence of the British raj’s rule in india? Civil servants were segregated from ordinary Indians. How did the decline of Mughal influence affect the East India company? the decline of mughal power allowed the EIC to expand its trading operations across the region.
How did the British treat the natives?
The English treated the Natives as inferior, believed they stood in the way of their God-given right to the land in America and tried to subject the Natives to their laws as they established their colonies.
What were two positive effects of British rule in India?
The British improved the Indian economy and helped Indians get out of poverty. The British helped empower women by banning certain unfair practices. hon invoduced parliamentary democracy and railways in India.
What are the positive impacts of British rule in India?
Positive Impact: Some positive impact of the British rule in India were the introduction of the railways, post and telegraph system for masses, introduction of Western sceinces and the English language. However, it is to be noted that the British intorduced railways for its own benifits.
What were some of the positive impacts of British imperialism in India?
In fact, during the time of the British Raj, India developed the fourth largest rail network on the planet with the help of British engineering. This infrastructure benefitted India in that it allowed the country better transportation networks that ultimately helped it transport goods and people across the country.